NR 501 Week 5 Assignment_Guidelines and Rubric./rated for scoring A

Document Content and Description Below

PURPOSE Week 5 Assignment: Application of Theory Guidelines with Scoring Rubric Within the profession of nursing, multiple theories, models, and conceptual frameworks have been created to serv... e as a foundation for practice. The purpose of this assignment is to appraise the value of the model in serving as a theoretical framework and apply the model to your selected area of future professional nursing practice (your MSN track). For this assignment, you will select one of the following nursing models to address within the paper: the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model. COURSE OUTCOMES Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes: • Apply nursing theory as a framework to guide the translation of knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice in future professional settings. (CO #2) • Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationships among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice. (CO#4) TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE This assessment is worth 175 points. DUE DATE Submit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. For the theory I selected the patient-centered care theory one in my weekly posting for this week, I believe we have to select the same one for the paper Here is the required reading: MAKE SURE TO REFERNCE THE TWO HIGHLIGHTED. McEwen, M., & Wills, E. (2014). Theoretical basis for nursing (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. • Chapter 5: Theory Analysis and Evaluation (pp. 95 - 113). Please review the textbooks below to complete your Week 5 Assignment Groenwald, S. L. (Ed.). (2018). Designing & creating a culture of care for students and faculty: The Chamberlain University College of nursing model. Washington, DC: National League for Nursing. McCormack, B., & McCance, T. (2017). Person-centered practice in nursing and health care. Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. REQUIREMENTS Criteria for Content NR501_Week 5 Assignment_FEB2018_JCJ/AS Select one of the two models presented in the week five lesson (either the Person-Centered Nursing Framework, or the Chamberlain Care Model). 1. In a three- to four-page scholarly paper, address the following: a. Provide a succinct overview of the model you have selected and discuss how the selected model addresses the four concepts within the nursing metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). b. Discuss how the selected model qualifies as a theoretical framework within the profession of nursing, and its use within the profession. c. Describe how the chosen model can be applied in the future APN role (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). PREPARING THE PAPER Submission Requirements 1. Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment. 2. Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at least three and no more than four pages in length. 3. A minimum of four (5) scholarly literature sources must be used (JOURNALS ONLLY). 4. Submission: Submit your file to the Canvas course site by the due date/time indicated. Best Practices in Preparing the Project The following are best practices in preparing this project. 1. Review directions thoroughly. 2. Follow submission requirements. 3. Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included. 4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing. 5. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. 6. Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly. 7. A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature references must be used. 8. Abide by CCN academic integrity policy. GRADING CRITERIA Category Points % Description Introduction 18 10% Introduction includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. State the selected model that will be analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. Identify sections of the paper. Provide citations from scholarly nursing sources to validate your assertions. Overview of 35 20% Present a succinct overview of the selected model. Discuss the key NR501_Week 5 Assignment_FEB2018_JCJ/AS Selected Model concepts within the model. Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). Provide citations from scholarly nursing sources to validate your assertions. Appraisal of the Model as a Nursing Theory 35 20% Explain how the selected model qualifies as a theory to serve as a theoretical framework for nursing practice. Discuss how the model has been used within the profession. Provide citations from scholarly nursing sources to validate your assertions. Application of the Model to Advanced Practice Nursing 35 20% Discuss how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Include one specific example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) Provide citations from scholarly nursing sources to validate your work. Conclusion 25 15% Provide a succinct conclusion to the paper, including the following elements: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment. Writing in the first-person may be included for the self-reflection. APA Format 18 10% Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section or topic of the paper (one deduction for each type of APA style error). Ideas and information that come from scholarly sources must be cited and referenced correctly. A minimum of four (4) scholarly references are used. Writing Mechanics 9 5% Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment first person may be used. Total 175 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all the above requirements. NR501_Week 5 Assignment_FEB2018_JCJ/AS GRADING RUBRIC Assessmen Exceptional t Criteria (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance Content Possible Points = 148 Points Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance Introduction 18 Points 16 Points 14Points 7 Points 1 Points Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. Presentation of information is superficial and includes all of the following elements: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. • States the selected model that will be • States the selected model that will be • States the selected model that will be • States the selected model • States the selected model analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. that will be analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. that will be analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. Overview of Selected Model 35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 Points Presentation of Presentation of Presentation of Presentation of Presentation of information is information is superficial information is minimally information in one of the information in two or comprehensive and in places and includes all demonstrated and following elements fails to more following elements concise and includes all of of the following elements: includes all of the meet expectations or is fail to meet expectations the following elements: following elements: missing the following: or are missing the • Selects either the • Selects either the • Selects either the following: Patient-Centred Patient-Centred Patient-Centred • Selects either the • Selects either the Nursing (PCN) Nursing (PCN) Nursing (PCN) Patient-Centred Patient-Centred Framework or the Framework or the Framework or the Nursing (PCN) Nursing (PCN) Chamberlain Care Chamberlain Care Chamberlain Care Framework or the Framework or the Model. Model. Model. Chamberlain Care Chamberlain Care • Presents a succinct • Presents a succinct • Presents a succinct Model. Model. overview of the overview of the overview of the • Presents a succinct • Presents a succinct selected model. selected model. selected model. overview of the overview of the • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. selected model. • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. selected model. • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. Appraisal of the Model as a Nursing Theory 35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 Points Presentation of information is Presentation of information is superficial Presentation of information is minimally Presentation of information in one of the Presentation of information in two or comprehensive and in places and includes all demonstrated and following elements fails to more of the following concise and includes all of of the following elements: includes all of the meet expectations or is elements fail to meet the following elements: following elements: missing the following: expectations or are • Explains how the • Explains how the • Explains how the missing the following: selected model selected model selected model • Explains how the • Explains how the qualifies as a theory qualifies as a theory qualifies as a theory selected model selected model to serve as a to serve as a to serve as a qualifies as a theory qualifies as a theory theoretical framework theoretical theoretical framework to serve as a to serve as a for nursing practice. framework for nursing for nursing practice. theoretical framework theoretical framework • Discusses how the practice. • Discusses how the for nursing practice. for nursing practice. model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources. • Discusses how the model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources. model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources. • Discusses how the model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources. • Discusses how the model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources. Application of the Model to Advanced Practice Nursing 35 Points 31 points 28 Points 13 points 0 Points Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Includes one specific • Includes one specific • Includes one specific example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) • Includes one specific example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) • Includes one specific example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources o Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources Conclusion 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the first-person may be included for Presentation of information is good but superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the first-person may be Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the first-person Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fails to meet expectations or are missing the following: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the first-person may be the self- reflection first-person may be included for the self- reflection included for the self- reflection may be included for the self- reflection included for the self- reflection Content Subtotal /148 points Format Possible Points = 27 Points APA Format 18 Points 16 Points 14 Points 7 Points 0 Points APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 0 to 1 APA error is present APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 2–3 APA errors are present APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 4–5 APA errors are present APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 6–7 APA errors are present APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 8 or greater APA errors are present References 3 Point Deduction and Page Length Note: Students are to use at least four (4) scholarly references. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least three but no more than four pages. Does not use at least four (4) scholarly references and/or exceeds required page length. Writing Mechanics 9 Points 8 Points 7 Points 3 Points 0 Points 1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used. 3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used. 5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used. 7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used. 9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used. Format Subtotal /27 points Total Points /175points Comments: [Show More]

Last updated: 1 year ago

Preview 1 out of 12 pages