Law > A/As Level Mark Scheme > OCR GCE AS Level Law H018/02: Law making and the law of tort VERIFIED Mark Scheme for June 2022 (All)

OCR GCE AS Level Law H018/02: Law making and the law of tort VERIFIED Mark Scheme for June 2022

Document Content and Description Below

OCR GCE AS Level Law H018/02: Law making and the law of tort VERIFIED Mark Scheme for June 2022 1. Explain and illustrate the purposive approach to statutory interpretation. Answers may include t... he following: • Explain that the purposive approach seeks to give effect to the general intention and spirit of the statute as opposed to the literal meaning of its words • In Maunsell v Ollins (1975) Lord Simons suggested a two-tier test. The judge is to look to the purpose of the legislation and then must look at the words and interpret them according to the purpose • Identify that the purposive approach takes a broader approach than the mischief rule in that the court is not just looking to see what the gap was in the old law; the judges are deciding what they believe Parliament is trying to achieve – what is the purpose of the Act? • Explain that judges are required to consider the broader context in which the law was created – what were the concerns of government and Parliament at the time the Act was created? • Recognise the increased need for judges to refer to external aids • Describe how this rule has been increasingly used in recent years • Describe how this rule links to a more continental approach to interpretation and the increased use is associated with our membership of the EU and the way judges are expected to interpret EU legislation – for example, UK judges are obliged to interpret UK law in the light of EU law under the doctrine of indirect effect • Describe the perceived unconstitutional nature of the rule • Use any relevant case to illustrate its use – Coltman v Bibby Tankers, Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association, R v Registrar General ex p Smith, Jones v Tower Boot, Ghaidan v Mendoza, R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle, IRC v McGuckian, Pickstone v Freemans plc, Pepper v Hart [Show More]

Last updated: 1 year ago

Preview 1 out of 18 pages

Reviews( 0 )

$30.00

Add to cart

Instant download

Can't find what you want? Try our AI powered Search

OR

GET ASSIGNMENT HELP
69
0

Document information


Connected school, study & course


About the document


Uploaded On

Mar 24, 2023

Number of pages

18

Written in

Seller


seller-icon
Alexander Tarimo

Member since 1 year

0 Documents Sold


Additional information

This document has been written for:

Uploaded

Mar 24, 2023

Downloads

 0

Views

 69

Document Keyword Tags

More From Alexander Tarimo

View all Alexander Tarimo's documents »

Recommended For You


$30.00
What is Browsegrades

In Browsegrades, a student can earn by offering help to other student. Students can help other students with materials by upploading their notes and earn money.

We are here to help

We're available through e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, and live chat.
 FAQ
 Questions? Leave a message!

Follow us on
 Twitter

Copyright © Browsegrades · High quality services·