NR 603 Week 6 Mental Health Final Treatment Plan/Analysis – Part 2-Chamberlain College Of Nursing:( SATISFACTION GUARANTEED, RATED A )

Document Content and Description Below

1 Nr 603 wk 6 mental health final SOAP/Analysis pt 2  Due Sunday by 11:59pm  Points 40  Submitting a file upload  Available until Feb 20 at 11:59pm Please see Couse Resources for Wee... k 6 Mental Health Presentation Rubric The final SOAP will include your case with diagnosis and treatment plan in SOAP format. After you write out the SOAP include the following sections in a large area called ANALYSIS: 1. Pathophysiology and Pharmacology: For the primary diagnoses in the case, write a brief summary of the underlying pathophysiology and tie pharmacological treatment chosen in the reversal or control of that pathology. 2. Additional analysis of the case: This includes national guidelines that were or should have been used to make diagnosis or treatment and review how they applied or how care was unique but based in guidelines. 3. Follow-up: This means how the patient was doing when seen a second time if this applies. This would be their response to your plan of care. 4. Quality: Include anything that should have been considered in hindsight or changes you would make in seeing similar patients in the future with the same complaint, history, exam, or diagnosis. Add anything you learned from discussion in the class that shed new light on this patient. 5. Coding and Billing. Any or all CPT and ICD-10 codes that should have been used (List them and name them only. Students will not receive credit for work submitted after Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of Week 6. Rubric NR603 Summary (40) NR603 Summary (40) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplicatio n of Knowledge 15.0 pts ExceptionalThorough treatment plan and analysis of the following for summary: guidelines that should have been used, what further should have been added to care or follow up, lessons learned from this and class discussion. The final analysis section must also contain: *Pathophysiolog y and Pharmacology analysis 13.0 pts ExceedsCase study summary submissio n is somewhat thorough and has analysis and all parts, but lacks depth in some minor way. 12.0 pts MeetsCase study summary and analysis is missing parts, and lacks depth in some minor way and/or missing more than one componen t listed in the assignmen t guidelines. 6.0 pts Needs Improvement - Submission perspectives are not consistent with current practice. Analysis is minimal in final SOAP, or depth of discussion with others does not demonstrate deep learning. 0.0 pts Developing - Submission offers no insight or application to the assignment or course content. 15.0 pt s This study source was downloaded by 100000831988016 from CourseHero.com on 04-18-2022 07:49:52 GMT -05:00 https://www.coursehero.com/file/38018761/WEEK-6-PART-2-soap-docx/ 2 Nr 603 wk 6 mental health final SOAP/Analysis pt 2 NR603 Summary (40) Criteria Ratings Pts *Additional analysis of the case as noted above *Followup *Quality Analysis *Coding and Billing This study source was downloaded by 100000831988016 from CourseHero.com on 04-18-2022 07:49:52 GMT -05:00 https://www.coursehero.com/file/38018761/WEEK-6-PART-2-soap-docx/ 3 Nr 603 wk 6 mental health final SOAP/Analysis pt 2 NR603 Summary (40) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport from EvidenceBased Practice (EBP) 15.0 pts Exceptional - Treatment plan and Analysis are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided.In itial discussion posts are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. 13.0 pts ExceedsInitial discussio n posts are partially supporte d by evidence from appropri ate sources publishe d within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full referenc es are provided . Evidence -based referenc e(s) used but may not fully support the treatmen t plan. 12.0 pts MeetsInitial discussi on posts are partiall y support ed by evidenc e. Sources may not be scholarl y in nature or may be older than 5 yea [Show More]

Last updated: 1 year ago

Preview 1 out of 5 pages