WGU D002 Case Laws Questions and Answers Graded A

Document Content and Description Below

WGU D002 Case Laws Questions and Answers Graded A Brown v. Topeka Board of Education ✔✔Supreme court ruled that education must be available to all children on equal terms. Separate is not Equal... . 9-0 vote Hobsen v. Hansen ✔✔stated IQ tests were culturally biased; ruled against track system based on IQ testing Diana v. California State Board of Education ✔✔requires that schools provide tests to students in their first language or by means that doesn't require English fluency PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ✔✔All children with disability right to FAPE. Because segregation based on race was deemed unconstitutional, segregation based on disability is also unconstitutional Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia ✔✔lack of funding is not a good enough reason to not provide SPED to qualifying students Larry P. v. Riles ✔✔Case Ruled that IQ test could not be used as the primary or sole basis of placing students in special programs; led to multi-tiered SPED evaluation process Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson School System v. Rowley ✔✔school is required to provide FAPE based on students needs, not more expensive services at parent request beyond FAPE Irving Independent School District v. Tatro ✔✔Forced schools to provide non- physician required medical services to allow a physically impaired student to attend school Honig v. Doe ✔✔students who misbehavior is related to their disability can not be denied education Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education ✔✔-1989 -redefined the definition of least restricted environment along with appropriate (some students need to be taught in self-contained classes) Florence County School Dist 4 v. Shannon Carter Forest Grove School Dist v. TA ✔✔parents entitled to reimbursement if they were denied FAPE and had to enroll their child in a private school Endrew F. v Douglas County School District ✔✔in favor of a higher standard of education for children with disabilities. - stated that a child's "educational program must be appropriately ambitious in light of his circumstances" and that "every child should have the chance to meet challenging objectives." [Show More]

Last updated: 1 year ago

Preview 1 out of 3 pages